Motions Filed With Sioux County District Court Monday morning, July 29, 2019, regarding 5th degree Criminal Mischief Charge Made Against Paul R. Dorr accused of burning library books.
Motherhood is, at best, a minor annoyance to most married Christian women today, as they drop their child(ren) off at the daycare. (Few advised them of the massive student debt they’d incurr while often earning a college degree of limited value.) Their career too often dominates their life. Their child(ren) are growing further apart from them and worse, from God. Many such mothers then are reduced to trying to ‘buy’ their child’s love.
Young mothers – consider below the eternal perspective and the concentrated power to form lives for Christ that you possess. This was written 160 years ago and still remains as powerful today!
“Let us take as an illustration, the case of the mother of a family. The cares of a family are numerous and heavy; and there are many instances, in which it is impossible for a mother, and head of a house, to be engaged in much external ministry for God. But if she be willing to serve Him, she need not be disheartened.
Is not home a little world in itself, and is not she, either for good or evil, the grand influence of home, much, most of it taking its tone from her? Would that Christian mothers recognized more, the great opportunities and responsibilities of home ministry; that they saw how the very fact of their influence being concentrated, gave it force! The charge of gunpowder, which occupies but a little space, sends the shot to a long-distance; what mother can tell, how far her concentrated influence will send her children, in the career of holiness, and usefulness among their fellows.
There is ministry in a Mother’s look. It has re-appeared in after life, amid the gleaming eyes which burn with unhallowed fires; and succoured the tempted one by the memory of its solemn, soft, and holy gaze.
There is ministry in a mother’s voice. It has re-echoed, after many years in the chambers of the memory, and warned in deep mysterious tones, as though it now came from another world, and cheered, and soothed, with even more than the power it possessed in earlier days, as though it were privileged to speak with the soft melody of heaven.
Yes! There is ministry even in a mother’s touch; and long after the hand from which it came, is cold in the motionless solitude of the tomb, it’s impress remains in living power. A mysterious hand from the invisible world traced the sentence of Belshazzar’s ruin; this hand, mysterious and invisible also, leaves imprinted on the heart, words at once of warning and of love – words of most powerful warning, because words of love.
… Yes! Christian mothers, God requires testimony and ministry from you, in your own circles. If you be limited to them, by Him, He will accept your home ministry, and he will not leave you without a reward. You shall act upon the world, from the recesses of your own sanctified home; the ministry which you carried on for God upon the child at your knee, shall have a place, not in the annals of the world alone; your sons will perhaps be the fathers of God-fearing, and God praising families; they will perhaps minister in the public service of the sanctuary; they will salt the society in which they move. It may be, that your daughters, as mothers, will reproduce your influence, the circle widening with every generation; and thus (provided God has limited your circle) show you, if you minister in it for Him, throw forth circles ever-widening more and more, so that you, being dead, shall speak, and live, and move in influence, long after you have departed in the flesh.”
Rev. Philip Bennett Power, M.A., Christ Church, Worthing, West Sussex, England, I Will: Determinations of the Man of God, as found in some of the “I Wills” of the Psalms, p. 75-76, © 1860, Reprint Pranava Books, India
Mitch Mortvedt, Assistant Director, Field Operations Bureau, Iowa Department of Public Safety, Iowa Division of Criminal Investigation, Des Moines, IA advised me this month that this attached file is the most current policy manual the state issues to law enforcement officers as to guidelines for interviews, field interviews and interrogations conducted during criminal investigations. You might learn a bit by reviewing it and consider some of my highlights and comments in the red boxes. You can download it here.
I filed my legal response in Sioux County Magistrate Court tonight to the criminal mischief charges filed against me by Sioux County, Iowa Attorney Thomas Knustle on behalf of the City of Orange City. We’ve asked Cherokee County, Iowa Magistrate Judge Lisa Mazurek to sign an order to dismiss the charges. As you read the Memorandum you will find the books I burned were later paid for. I did not pay for them nor did I specifically ask or authorize anyone to pay for them. But the books were paid for, none-the-less. And they still charged me with a crime. But that’s just ‘half of it’.
Here’s a quote from my closing statement in the Memorandum,
” Dorr was charged with criminal mischief in the fifth degree because of his protest and because he published the protest. He filmed himself burning the books, and then posted the video to the internet and Facebook to publish his message, to encourage public discourse in the marketplace of ideas. . In his effort to raise awareness on his side of an issue, the Library ignored its procedural policies and the police responded to the public outcry for prosecution by criminally charging Mr. Dorr. Likewise, Orange City ignored Iowa Code § 714.5, which allows for “arrangements [to] be made to make a monetary settlement.”
Instead, Mr. Dorr was treated unlike other library patrons who had not returned books, and but for his public protest, Mr. Dorr literally had “the book thrown at him” to teach him a lesson. But, what lesson? That the Library can avoid its procedural policy in lieu of protected First Amendment rights? That people can be treated unequally for non-returned books?
As noted before, if Mr. Dorr had protested in silence and destroyed the books yet the, books had been paid for, would he have been prosecuted? He still would be exercising his First Amendment rights. Regardless, the answer would be “no.” The only interceding fact in this case was his published protest. The Library ignored its policies and the police charge was selectively based upon nothing more than an act of protected First Amendment activities.”
Read the documents linked below that I filed with the District Court today.
(CAUTION: Only mature adults should read Exhibit 6 on my Affidavit in Support with Exhibits attachment. It includes vile blasphemies against our Lord and sexually depraved remarks sent to me through the comment section on this page, that the court needed to consider.)
Motion to Dismiss
Affidavit of Amended Memorandum and Exhibit Ten
Affidavit of Paul Dorr in Support with Exhibits
Reply Memorandum’s Support
RTP rejects the RCUS’s historic position on tolerance of public education but do endorse this well-grounded paper on the sin of cremating the bodies of deceased saints.
Do you want to insure that the medical community expressly knows that you and your loved ones do not waive their liability in making medical-care decisions regarding your health and life, when you are unable to? Do you want to make the positive determinations as to what care is required, or not, in your final hours? Do you want to specifically grant medical powers of attorney to those of your choosing? If so, see these templates for christian Medical Living Wills drawn up for residents of Iowa and Texas.
Do not see these as complete or lawful in your case. Rather, take them to your own attorney and have him review and update them as required especially if you are a resident of another state. That is why we are providing these in editable MS Word format.
Once completed, sign multiple copies and forward them (by registered mail) to the hospitals and doctors in your area that you normally receive medical care from and carry copies in the glove box of your vehicles. Also, make scanned digital copies available to loved ones who can promptly email it to the administrator and risk officer of any hospital or trauma center that you may be admitted to, that hadn’t previously received it.
Abby Johnson 2011: “Some of you may think the abortionists hold more guilt than the mother. I disagree. I do not believe women are “victims” to abortion. I have had two abortions. I was not a victim. I was a perpetrator.”
Here are screen shots if she takes down the above link.
Now she changes her mind on her Meme below. Murder has now been reduced to a “service” that needs no accountability by the state. Does she believe the father and all the friends and family who aid/abetted the death of this child should get a free pass, too?
While punishment for capital crimes has many extenuating circumstances and thus can receive various degrees of sanctions from the state, biblically, the death penalty is appropriate for those who murder with planning and intent. Clearly Abby Johnson no longer thinks she merits punishment from the state, if such had been on the books when she committed her high crimes.
“Whoever sheds man’s blood, By man his blood shall be shed; For in the image of God He made man. And as for you, be fruitful and multiply;
Bring forth abundantly in the earth And multiply in it.” Gen. 9:6-7
Mrs. Johnson conveniently holds to a modernist Catholic position where she strongly opposes capital punishment. She’s in the business to stop mass-murder while opposing the sanctions of God’s Law against such criminal conduct.
Not all women who abort would receive capital punishment, as other crimes of murder don’t receive it now, either. But avoiding the deterrent effect of God’s just Law against those who dismember their own child, only serves to increase such butchery.
Meanwhile, Mrs. Johnson’s Speaking Fees: $10,000 to $15,000 with this service. As well, they are listed as $10,000 to $20,000 with this Speaker’s agent below.
Now to see what real repentant men and women who participated in, or aborted their children, look like see this screen shot below. First and foremost they confess Christ, then they confess they murdered their child and are not victims. They are part of the team in Texas advocating to criminalize abortion again. This is who Abby Johnson should turn too, for real spiritual advice and counsel.
Meet Abby’s lesbian “pro-life” friends. Are there any pro-life Drag Queens she can invite to one of her Guiding Star events?
State and local governments are defying the Federal government on marijuana (Colorado), immigration (sanctuary cities), compliance with the Paris Accord (Minnesota), 2nd Amd. (red flag laws), etc. But like most socialists Mrs. Johnson places the welfare state above the lives of the babies with many false scare stories. Criminalizing abortion would end her gravy train!
We at Rescue the Perishing have been battling abortion since 1980. Over the years we’ve watched the Christian community and the pro-life movement become thoroughly compromised. Since the early 1990s people like Leslee Unruh of the National Abstinence Clearinghouse and other national “leaders” started speaking of women has victims of abortion. This served to ignore the baby in most cases. (Yes, there are a few that are drug, as teenagers, into an abortion clinic by their parents and forced to get an abortion. But that is just a few and we’re not including them as they and their babies were victims of their wicked parents…..probably in more ways than one.) Far too many pro-life “leaders” are quasi-feminists and many have previously murdered their own child(ren).
But for today the vast majority going into abortion clinics have a heart set on wickedness and often brag about killing their own flesh and blood child. See this stunning report of true confessions from a Christian sidewalk counselor in the Houston, TX area.
Laws which the National Right to Live Committee have defended for years, that will not punish the murderous woman, are wicked. Before you disagree do read the report on our link above.
The Christian Philosophy Of Law, Politics And The State, by the Rev. Eustace Lovatt Hebden Taylor, former Dordt College Professor of History and Sociology, The Craig Press, © 1966 (Taylor was trained at Trinity Hall, Cambridge University)
“It is because the Supreme Court of the United States has forgotten that “man’s freedom depends upon the silence of the law” and that man’s legal relationships are only a small part of his total societal relationships that it has now taken upon itself to forcibly integrate colored and white men into one educational association regardless of the deep historical and social differences existing between these groups. Given the different cultural and historical background of these groups in American society, it is hardly surprising that such social engineering on the part of the executive and judicial branches of American government should create intolerable tensions within the American body politic.” p 306
“That the standard of justice for social relations is different from the standard required in legal relations is proved by the fact that social contracts do not get very far in the courts. A violation of social norms may but does not necessarily transgress legal norms as well. The social basis of law implies the competence of the legislator, but this competence must be limited by the proper correlation of the communal and associational functions which may not be infringed by this supposed absolute confidence of the state. The individual does not enjoy an absolute legal competence or absolute rights, but neither does the state nor central government enjoy absolute sovereignty over man in deciding, for example, which schools their children shall attend and which they shall not. Such absoluteness is removed if we consider that justice in the social analogy requires a proper balance between the state, the communities and the associations making up a given human society.” p 306-307
“Such a claim to decide men’s societal relationships in all their manifold variety is typical of the totalitarian state. For the United States Supreme Court and President or for the British Parliament to enact legislation, telling Americans or Britons with whom they shall be educated and where they may or may not eat, play, attend church and work is thus a gross invasion of the American or British citizen’s right to choose his own type of education for his children, his own eating habits and restaurants and his own recreational activities.
Racial issues are not settled by legislation nor at the point of bayonets. They are settled by time and a spirit of patience and of Christ-like forgiveness and understanding of the people directly involved. Military force is not a substitute for persuasion.” p 307
“Liberal humanists have not realized that the basic issue in the present grave racial crisis in America, at least as far as education is concerned, is that the American Federal and State Governments had no business to be involved in the field of education in the first place. Education is solely the God-given responsibility of parents. Children are born by reason of the natural powers of reproduction of their parents, not because of the permission of the government. It is because the Federal and State governments of America have infringed upon the sovereignty of the family and parental sphere by making the education of American children a part of the function of government that the present crisis over the integration of white and colored schools has arisen. It is because the American public school has been used to serve the improper purposes of providing the basis for the secular humanistic American way of life that all the trouble has arisen. It is unjust and contrary to God’s cultural mandate for bringing up one’s own children to use the school for such a political purpose.” p 307-308
“It is nonsense on the part of educational apostate liberal humanists to claim that all children, regardless of their parents’ ideological and religious persuasion, can meet together on the grounds of a supposedly neutral educational field. While the public schools of the Deep South have so far achieved only a token integration, Roman Catholic Christians have achieved a far greater degree of integration in their school system for the reason that such integration takes place on a consciously accepted religious basis. Let the Protestant Christians of America, both colored and white, establish their own Christian day schools, using their common faith in Christ as the basis of harmonious racial relationships. The only power on this earth which can really bring about true community between people is the religious faith which they hold in common. Recent events in America and South Africa have proved that the liberal humanist faith in man’s reason, utility and a so-called natural law of the equality between men cannot do this.
The great illusion of modern “post-Christian” democrats and the humanists is that true community can be created between men without the grace and power of the risen Christ. In the very same year in which James Meredith was forcibly admitted to the University of Mississippi, the Supreme Court prohibited the saying of the Lord’s Prayer in the public-school system of America. Such apostate humanists apparently expect men to live as brothers without believing in God as their Creator, to found a community of men without any common life of sacraments and creed to bind them together, and to think as one while remaining utterly individualistic and self-seeking. It is tragic to thank the Anglican Bishops and clergy actually support such humanistic hopes.” p 308
“May every true Christian in the English-speaking world proclaim from the housetops that it is impossible to enjoy the fruits of Christianity without first accepting Christ’s kingship over one’s own personal life. Outside the body of Christ the world of apostasy from God stands doomed and condemned. The secular humanist values of “liberty,” “equality,” and “fraternity” are miserable shadows of the Christian experience of the Fatherhood of God, of being adopted children in Christ, of the liberty wherewith Christ makes us free from the power and guilt of sin, and of the fellowship of the Holy Spirit.” p 308-309
“It is impossible to expect colored and white people in any part of the world to live together in peace and true community unless both groups come to share in God’s forgiveness of their sins and both races find in the risen Christ a common loyalty in terms of which they can alone build up a stable world order. For the same reason, it is equally futile to expect unregenerate apostate white men and women to live in peace with each other or to expect unconverted heathen colored men and women to live in real community with each other, unless and until such men and women, whatever the color of their scans, first repent of their sins and then are willing to be led by the spirit of Christ in building up separate Christian associations and organizations not contaminated by the evil and wickedness of a rebellious world. It is therefore imperative that Christians throughout the world now establish their own Christian day schools, newspapers, trade and labor unions, credit unions and political parties in which Christ’s kingship is taken seriously. Let Christian people in America, Britain and Canada stop relying upon humanist governments to do the work of a rousing Americans, Britons and Canadians to repent of their sins. It is utterly beyond the powers of the American, British and Canadian governments to create lasting fellowship and peace between differing classes and races. It is only the risen Christ who can reconcile sinners to a just and holy God. Let us pray that God will give these nations time for amendment of life and repentance of our Church’s failure to witness to the glorious power of the gospel of Christ, crucified and risen for the justification and forgiveness of our sins, including the sin of prejudice, and for the reconciliation of races, classes and nations. (2 Corinthians 5:19).” p 309
No matter one’s position on vaccinating their babies, their physician should have no problem filling out a Physician’s-Warranty-of-Vaccine-Safety, sign it and then provide it to you, prior to injecting any vaccine into your child. This warranty includes waiving their personal legal immunity from any harm they may cause, prior to their proposal to vaccinate your child.